top of page

Best Local SEO Company for Google: Who Is Actually Deciding That?

Sep 30
5 min read

You typed best local SEO company for Google hoping that somebody with authority has already done the sorting. That is a reasonable hope, and we would rather tell you straight where it stands: Google's own guidance on hiring an SEO does not point you to a list of approved companies. It tells you what to ask, and to be wary of any company that claims a special relationship with Google. The lists you land on were compiled by someone else, for their own reasons. They can still be useful, and knowing who made them changes how you read them and which claims on a company's website deserve a second look.

The check you can run tonight, on any name on your shortlist

Open each company's website and read its own words about Google. You are looking for three specific claims, because Google names all three in its published guidance on hiring an SEO as reasons to be careful: a guarantee of rankings, a claimed special relationship with Google, and a priority submit to Google. Its guidance states plainly that no one can guarantee a number one ranking. You do not need any tool for this and you do not need a call. It is on the homepage or the services page of anyone who makes those claims, in their own writing, and it takes about 10 minutes across a shortlist of five.

A three-item card of the claims to look for on a shortlisted company's own website: a guarantee of rankings, a special relationship with Google, a priority submit.

Who decides which local SEO company is best

Three different groups produce the ranked lists that come up for this search, and none of them is Google. Review directories rank companies by a mix of client reviews, submitted work and, on some of them, paid placement. Publishers write best of roundups as content, and whether a given roundup is sponsored or carries affiliate links is something you check on that page itself, where a disclosure would sit. And agencies write their own best of posts, in which they appear. A ranking of SEO companies is a document somebody made for a reason, and the first useful question about any of them is who compiled it and what they got out of it.

Three columns naming who compiles lists of the best local SEO companies: review directories, publishers, and agencies, none of them Google.

What Google does publish about this

Google's own guidance for people hiring an SEO says that advertising with Google will not have any effect on your site's presence in its search results, that Google never accepts money to include or rank sites in its search results, and that it costs nothing to appear in its organic search results. Those three sentences do a lot of work. They mean nobody can buy their way into the organic results, nobody holds a channel into Google that you do not, and a company advertising a shortcut is advertising something that does not exist. Google also publishes the list of questions it suggests you ask a provider, and the one we would put first is whether they will share with you all the changes they make to your site, with the reasoning behind them.

A three-item card of what Google's hiring guidance says: ads do not affect organic presence, Google never takes money to rank sites, organic results cost nothing.

Which Google SEO company is considered the best?

Google's guidance on hiring an SEO does not name one, so the honest answer is that it depends what you are buying and who is doing your work. A company can be excellent for a national retailer and a poor fit for a business with one owner and one website, and the reverse. What replaces the question is narrower and answerable: which company will do the work you need, at a price you can see, and show you what they did. The questions that get you there, on any provider, are set out in how to choose an SEO agency.

How much does Google charge for SEO?

Nothing. Google's guidance says it costs nothing to appear in its organic search results, and that Google never accepts money to include or rank sites there. What you pay for is somebody's time and judgment in making your site easier for Google to read and more likely to answer the question a customer typed. The separate thing you can pay Google for is advertising, which puts you in the ad slots and, by Google's own statement, has no effect on your presence in the organic results. If a quote does not make clear which of those two you are buying, that is the first thing to settle.

Two columns: what an SEO fee pays for, against advertising, which Google sells and which has no effect on organic results.

Local SEO ranking services, and what one can honestly promise

Ranking service is a name for the same work with the outcome in the title, and the name is where the trouble starts. A provider can promise the work: a list of changes, made on named pages, on a schedule, with a record. A provider cannot promise the position, because the position is decided by a system they do not control and is compared against competitors who are also changing their sites. A ranking service that promises movement in the work and reports honestly on the position is selling something real. One that promises the position itself is selling you the risk, which is why Google's guidance tells you to walk away from it.

Two columns: a provider can promise a dated list of changes; it cannot promise the ranking position.

How much should I pay for local SEO?

There is no standard figure, because local SEO is two different jobs sold under one name and a quote may not say which one it covers. One half is your business profile and the map result. The other half is your own website. A fee for one of those is not comparable with a fee for both, so the first move when you have two quotes is to ask each provider which half they are quoting for and what a month of it contains. Our own price, and the line by line split of what it covers and what it does not, is published on our pricing page rather than given out on a call.

Can I do SEO myself?

Often yes, and the clearest statement of that comes from Google: its guidance says that if you run a small local business you can probably do much of the work yourself, and recommends its own starter guide as the place to begin. Doing some of it yourself also makes you a better buyer, because you will recognize a technique that Google's own guidance discourages. What you are really deciding is whether the hours are better spent running your business. If you want to see the shape of the ongoing job before you decide, our guide to ongoing SEO lays out what the work is week to week.

What to do with the list you are holding

Use the lists for names and nothing else. Then run the 10-minute check on each one, ask each for the list of what they will do in a month and the record of what they did last month with dates, and ask which half of local SEO the quote covers. Three questions, and they work on a firm of any size, including on us. The company that answers all three plainly is telling you more than any position on a directory can. And if you would like a second pair of eyes on the answers that come back, reading them with you is something the free consultation below can help with.

A four-step sequence for using a best-of list: take names only, run the 10-minute check, ask for the monthly list and last month's record, ask which half of local SEO is quoted.

We sell the website half of the search work: one website, one price, a fixed number of optimizations to your site each week, cancel any time, no contract. The business profile and the map listing, new pages, redesigns, off-page work, and the other marketing channels are on the not-included list. What it costs is on our pricing page, beside what it does not cover, so you can hold it against anything else you have been quoted.

And if you have a shortlist and want a second read on which half each of them is quoting for, book a free SEO consultation. You will speak to the person who does the work.

Written by Spencer Capron at Capron Media, in collaboration with our AI agents. The same way we do the work for clients. Spencer reviews everything published here.

Comments


bottom of page