top of page

Website Funnel vs Website: What the Difference Actually Is

May 17, 2024
6 min read

Updated: Sep 13

Somebody has told you that you need a funnel. You already have a website, so the obvious question is whether you are being sold a second version of something you own. The honest answer is that a funnel and a website are not two products you pick between. One is a place, the other is a route through it, and most of the confusion in this subject comes from people selling the route as though it were a different place.

A website drawn as a grid of pages, beside the same grid with one highlighted route through three of them labelled lands here, compares, acts.

A funnel is a route, not a rival to your website

Your website is where everything about you lives: what you do, who you are, how to reach you, the things people need to look up. It answers many questions for many people, and that breadth is the job. A funnel is narrower. It is one path through some of those pages, aimed at one outcome, with the exits deliberately reduced along the way. It can run entirely on the site you already have. On plenty of small business sites one already exists by accident, because nobody drew it deliberately.

So which do you need?

Both, and they are not in competition. The question worth asking is not whether to build a funnel instead of a website. It is which single route through your existing site matters most, and whether anything on that route is currently in the way. That is answerable this afternoon and it costs nothing.

The four stages, and what each one is actually for

Awareness, interest, decision, action. The names are standard and slightly useless on their own, because they describe the visitor's state rather than telling you what to build. Here is the version that tells you what to build.

A narrowing four band funnel. Awareness, interest, decision and action, each labelled with the job that stage does rather than the visitor's state.

Awareness: they do not know you exist

Something puts you in front of a person who was not looking for you specifically. A search result, a recommendation, a post. The only job of this stage is to be findable for a question you can genuinely answer. Nothing later in the funnel can compensate for skipping it, which is why sites with a beautiful checkout and no traffic stay quiet.

Interest: they are willing to spend two more minutes

They clicked. Now the page has to be about the thing they clicked for. This is the stage that quietly kills the most funnels, because the page they land on is usually about the business rather than about their question.

Decision: they are comparing you to someone

Most people compare before they buy, and you will usually not see them doing it. At this stage a visitor is holding you against an alternative, often silently, and the things that help are the things you are most tempted to leave out: what it costs, what is included, what happens if it does not work.

Action: they do the thing

One clear next step, on the page where they decided, not three pages away. If a visitor has to navigate to act, some of them will not.

Where sites actually lose people

Not evenly across the four stages. The ones we run into most are below, and none of them is the checkout that gets all the attention.

The four funnel stages down the left, each joined to the specific way sites lose people at that stage, with a note that nothing measures the middle.

The landing page answers a different question

Someone searched for a specific problem and arrived on a page about your services in general. The page is not bad. It is simply not the answer to the question that produced the click, and a visitor works that out faster than you would like.

The price is not on the site

A visitor who cannot find what something costs does not usually email to ask. They assume it is expensive and leave, and you never learn that it happened. It is one of the first things we look for on a site that is getting traffic and no enquiries.

Every page offers the same next step

If the top of your funnel and the bottom both say book a call, you are asking a stranger and a nearly convinced buyer for the same commitment. One of them is not ready and the other one is being under-asked.

Nothing measures it

You can usually see how many people arrived and how many bought, and nothing in between. Without the middle you can only guess which stage is leaking, and guessing tends to land on whichever stage is easiest to redesign. We wrote up behaviour flow charts separately.

Do you need a separate funnel platform?

This is where most articles on this subject stop being useful, because the answer they give is the one their affiliate links pay for.

Two columns comparing what a dedicated funnel platform provides against the three costs that do not appear on its price page.

What the dedicated platforms genuinely do

Platforms built specifically for funnels give you fast page building, built-in stage tracking, and templates for common sequences. That is real value, and if you are running paid traffic to offers that change weekly, it is the right tool.

What they cost that is not on the price page

A second system to maintain, a second place your content lives, and a route your visitors take that is not on your domain. People do move away from these platforms, and it is worth reading what they say about why before you commit rather than after.

What most small sites should do instead

If you publish occasionally and sell one or two things, the pages you need already exist. Pick the route, fix what is in the way, and put the measurement in. A separate platform solves a problem you probably do not have yet, and it is easy to add later if you do.

When a funnel is the wrong thing to work on

There is a case where all of this is premature, and it is common enough to state plainly. If almost nobody is arriving, funnel work has nothing to operate on. Tightening a route matters when there is traffic on it. Before that, the constraint is being found at all, and effort spent on conversion is effort spent at a stage nobody has reached.

An empty funnel outline with no visitors entering it, captioned that the finding problem has to be fixed before conversion work has anything to act on.

Why this gets the order backwards so often

Conversion work is visible and satisfying. You can redesign a page in an afternoon and see the difference immediately, whereas becoming findable is slow and produces nothing you can look at for weeks. So the work that feels productive and the work that would help are different work, and the first one usually wins. A rough test, and it is a rule of thumb rather than a threshold anybody has proved: if the last step of your route completed only a handful of times last month, you do not have enough passing traffic to tell a good change from noise, and any improvement you measure is as likely to be the month as the edit. Fix the finding problem first. The route will still be there afterwards, and you will then be able to tell whether fixing it did anything.

How to tell whether yours is working

Two numbers, and you can get both without buying anything. How many people arrive at the first page of the route, and how many complete the last step. The ratio between them is your funnel, whatever software is or is not involved. Watch it for a month before you change anything, because a number with no baseline cannot tell you whether a change helped. We wrote up turning what you see into a change separately.

Two labelled boxes, arrivals at the first page of the route and completions of the last step, joined by an arrow, with the note that the ratio between them is the funnel.

The check worth running this week

Open your own site as though you had never seen it, from a search result rather than the home page. Try to buy the thing. Count the moments where you had to go looking for something. That list, in order, is your funnel's repair queue, and it is almost always shorter than people expect.

What we charge to run this kind of work every week is on our pricing page. It is one number and it does not change with the size of your site.

And if you would rather have somebody walk the route on your site and tell you where it leaks, book a free SEO consultation. You will speak to the person who does the work.

Written by Spencer Capron at Capron Media, in collaboration with our AI agents. The same way we do the work for clients. Spencer reviews everything published here.

Comments


bottom of page